The War Against How to Write Myself

The War Against How to Write Myself Finding the Best How to Write Myself No matter what type of novel you're writing, whatever the genre, there is not any novel without trouble. Everybody has a story to tell. Write about things that nobody is speaking about. Nobody else will read what you're writing. There are hundreds and hundreds of people around who would like to read what you've written. You ought to make sure you know the reasons that you need to work at home, you wish to select a house business which you know something about, you wish to start out slowly, you wish to take time for yourself and take time for fun. Take Time for Fun The last point to keep in mind when you're going into a home-based business is that you've got to take time for fun. When you are beginning a house business, things can appear overwhelming at first. You may want something different. Reasons The first thing you would like to do is to work out the reasons that you need to begin a home based b usiness. The solution to the latter is NO of course, and it's the exact same to the very first question also. Do What You Know Another thing which you should do when you are opting for a home based business is choose one which you know about already. Just don't forget that you want to do what works for you! After you locate a service you enjoy, don't neglect to look at my review of it. Paired with the internet service, it is a fantastic case of a well thought out experience, and one which I'm excited to follow as it evolves. Don't make your organization depend on a single client or one supplier, since you will never know what could happen with them. New Questions About How to Write Myself Read my essay writing service reviews and my guide to selecting the very best service for everything you want to understand about how to select the best writing businesses. Always make certain to take a look at the review my essay section of any writing service website you're contemplatin g using. It's crucial that the service you decide on knows for sure they're only employing the ideal essay writers. A follow-up email isn't a cold email. So there you have a couple suggestions about how to learn how to speak basic French. Then the post moves into published mode without delay. The very best non-professional editor is a person who can write and can be impartial. The term has lately been applied in the mainstream media to describe what's essentially mortgage fraud. Following that, you'll get a clean state back. Some folks also locate the large repetition jarring, and there's a frustrating absence of explanation for certain rules in instances. The tremendous work that's been done to renew the confidence of Black women in their very own beauty is a good example of what cultural alienation can do. All your published stories can be discovered on your public profile page, along with on your stories page. There are plenty of simple and completely free things you may do immediately to make your content stand out and get noticed. If you're hoping people will locate your article, the very last thing you desire is to wind up on page 2,824,716 of a Google search. Everyone would like to understand how they can receive their articles noticed in the endless expanse that's the net. You want short paragraphs with a lot of whitespace. At any time you post, share a hyperlink to your article anywhere it is sensible to share it. The wonderful thing about an outline is the fact that it provides you a direction. It isn't really hard to eliminate gendered terms from your writing, it just might take a little practice to take out the habit. How to Write Myself Help! Based on the occupation you're in, a French language course can be exceedingly beneficial and in higher demand, since so many individuals already speak Spanish. Yes, it's difficult to memorize and you seem to understand the reason you should force yourself to learn another language whe never you have your own language. French is among the most controlled languages on the planet. Learning how to speak French is a practice. Write about what it is that you're excited about, because the very best writing tends to reveal a bit of yourself anyway. It is possible to exclude plenty of prospective readers by glossing over instructions. Finding another pair of eyes on your writing, even merely a review, can help you to find issues. Or, if you would rather, have a blank bit of paper. If you a planning a visit to France, you truly must learn how to speak basic French. You can also offer suggestions and recommendation to keep the disease. Or consult with a close friend or relative who always appears to set you in a fantastic mood. There are infinite alternatives, and therefore don't feel like you've got to settle for Meeting Follow Up.

The Impact Of Organizational Culture On Enron s...

The tale of Enron presents a unique perspective on success. In the short span of 24 months, Enron transformed from being the top firm in its industry to one that filed for bankruptcy. The reflection about how the tides changed in such a short period uncovers many surprising truths. In its glory days Enron beamed billion dollar profits each quarter, however this success was all a part of an elaborate scheme. Behind the veil of smoke and mirrors was a series of deceptive and unethical accounting practices. For Jeff Skilling and Kenneth Lay it was always about outward perception and to them this revolved around the stock price. If the stock price kept rising, as far as they were concerned Enron was doing just fine. The case of Enron is the†¦show more content†¦The company did not consider whether the candidate would be a proper fit in the part of the company or work well in a team. They were solely hired based on potential profits they could earn for the company. Thus, highligh ting the low people and team orientation culture of Enron. Although Enron rated poorly on people and team orientation, they rated very highly on risk taking, aggressiveness and outcome orientation. The most salient aspect of Enron’s organizational culture is their risk-taking proclivity. Enron throughout the span of 24 months transformed from being the â€Å"Forbes most innovative company† to a company that was forced to file for bankruptcy and lay off almost 20,000 employees in part due to the risks they took. The corporation encouraged its employees to take risks at all costs as long it either improved the balance sheet or could be treated as a profit. The Darwinian culture at Enron cultivate a fiercely competitive environment. Employees saw one another as competition that they must beat to earn promotion and lucrative bonus. Due to this the traders at the company took numerous ill-advised risks and eventually gambled the company’s reserves away. The company’s emphasis on outcomes regardless of the steps taken p resented a unique conundrum. Per one scholar, â€Å"If corporate leaders encourage rule-breaking and foster an intimidating, aggressive environment, it is not surprising that theShow MoreRelatedManagement Course: Mba−10 General Management215330 Words   |  862 PagesManagement Course: MBA−10 General Management California College for Health Sciences MBA Program McGraw-Hill/Irwin abc McGraw−Hill Primis ISBN: 0−390−58539−4 Text: Effective Behavior in Organizations, Seventh Edition Cohen Harvard Business Review Finance Articles The Power of Management Capital Feigenbaum−Feigenbaum International Management, Sixth Edition Hodgetts−Luthans−Doh Contemporary Management, Fourth Edition Jones−George Driving Shareholder Value Morin−Jarrell LeadershipRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagescourses in Principles of Management, Human Resources, Strategy, and Organizational Behavior that helps you actively study and prepare material for class. Chapter-by-chapter activities, including built-in pretests and posttests, focus on what you need to learn and to review in order to succeed. Visit www.mymanagementlab.com to learn more. DEVELOPING MANAGEMENT SKILLS EIGHTH EDITION David A. Whetten BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Kim S. Cameron UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Prentice Hall Boston Columbus

Conflict And Negotiation Social and Authoritative Life

Question: Discuss about theConflict And Negotiationfor Social and Authoritative Life. Answer: Introduction Con?ict is an unavoidable piece of social and authoritative life. It must be dodged on the off chance that people keep away from human contact. To do that will be not as much as human. The issue lies not in the con?ict itself but rather in our standard reaction to it. At first, people overlook its presence, and when it falls flat, they react forcefully. In the event that it is a repeating con?ict, both of these reactions exacerbate it. The helpful option is to recognize its nearness and manage it in a critical thinking way. Con?ict then turns into a method for enhancing connection boats and viability. This record depicts how that should be possible. It starts by inspecting the nature and roots of con?ict, and after that portrays the fundamental abilities and systems, which can be connected to determine or anticipate it (Alfred et al, 2011). Some component of con?ict is to be found in all connections. It is basic since the conditions for its development are generally present. It requires as it were three conditions to be met (Barry et al, 2014). One or to a greater extent various individuals rely on upon the other(s) for their adequacy or fulfillment; The reliance exists inside a proceeding with relationship; and there is some obstruction to free correspondence. The relationship makes a need to impart. The hindrance anticipates sufficient correspondence. At the end of the day: Relationship + hindrance = clash In a progressing relationship, the contact keeps on gathering until it inevitably gets to be a clash. This is not to say that the con?ict is constantly genuine, or self-evident. In some cases, it is too trifling to be possibly justified regardless of the inconvenience of determining it (Bazerman et al, 2010). What's more, numerous con?ict remain covert. Individuals frequently like to disregard them instead of go out on a limb of bringing them away from any confining influence. Whatever the way of the social framework (family, club, association, hover of companions) a few obstructions will exist. For instance they might be: Physical, where the general population live in various houses or are generally geographically isolated; Worldly, maybe because of individuals working diverse movements; emerging from a distinction in qualities; A typical illustration is the era hole that may exist amongst more seasoned and more youthful supervisors or amongst guardians and young people; Because of contrasts in status, for instance amongst more seasoned and more youthful youngsters Inside formal social frameworks, considerably more obstructions emerge. To those officially recorded can be included: Basic, where every individual is in an alternate part of the association with distinctive objectives Because of contrasts in power, as amongst supervisor and subordinate; Emerging in light of the fact that interdependencies are uneven, for example, where the flow of work is in one direction These are proposed just as illustrations; there are numerous others. Literature Review People regularly structure our social frameworks in ways that expansion the potential for con?ict. The structures we utilize are not those that amplify contact between those with the best need to impart. They are rather the structures that streamline the control of associations and so forth by chiefs and others in power. The outcome is regularly to separate associate from partner, segment from area, furthermore, work from capacity (Bolman Deal, 2013). Therefore, the grating collects. The expanding grinding makes a more prominent requirement for correspondence. In the meantime, it might decrease the ability. In time, doubt may create as an extra and critical boundary, which may in the end turned out to be severe to the point that the general population cannot impart. What's more, without correspondence the con?ict cannot be determined. Trust and correspondence are connected in a manner that a change in one will prompt a change in the other. This then sustains to build the first place more. Thus the cycle proceeds. Unless there is some trust, those in debate cannot impart straightforwardly or to see each other eye-to-eye (Saner, 2010). Until there is correspondence, trust can't be progressed. In the event that con?ict is to be determined, those included require some insignificant level of critical thinking and relational abilities. They additionally should have the capacity to utilize an approach that applies these abilities to characterizing the issues and managing them. These are the themes to be secured beneath. To start with, fundamental critical thinking and relational abilities are tended to. Procedures for con?ict administration are then depicted. Negotiation Concession is a basic leadership prepare in which individuals commonly choose how to apportion rare assets all over seems to include principally the trading of substantial products and ventures, yet it likewise leaves a characteristically mental engraving on those included (Trotschel, 2011). Late research has joined subjective, social mental elements into the investigation of negotiation, testing the realist suspicion that has had a tendency to depict negotiation as an monetarily spurred or vital collaboration best rehearsed by objective, unemotional on-screen characters maybe as a consequence of the sources of the field in the investigation of decision and expected utility inside financial aspects. This paper displays the consequences of an extensive scale examination intended to include to this assemblage of research, by giving a far-reaching system of subjective results in negotiation. The objective is both to add to the headway of hypothesis and to give an instrument to analysts to ponder subjective esteem in negotiations with a comparable level of exactness as that with which more substantial target esteem has been considered for a considerable length of time (Carlopio Andrawartha, 2012). Albeit objective behavioral results unmistakably speak to an imperative part of negotiation execution, scientists have since quite a while ago reprimanded the relative absence of consideration paid to social mental measures in negotiation. As right on time as 1975, Rubin and Brown contended that, the time has come to move such apportion of the dim break known as 'supplementary examination's again into the cutting edge of specialists' consideration, where they have a place. Since the 1960s and 70s, there has been a progressive increment in the utilization of perceptual and attitudinal measures as reliant factors inside investigations of negotiation, yet even in the late ten year time frame from 1993-2002, such measures were incorporated into just 34% of research (James, 2016). Different studies have consolidated social mental elements as the indicators of financial results, instead of as important results themselves. The present paper endeavors to fill this crevice with a progression of studies mapping the area of subjective esteem in negotiation, utilizing a mix of techniques to investigate and order the scope of mental elements that individuals esteem as the results of their negotiations. People likewise display the improvement and beginning approval of a review apparatus to quantify subjective esteem. The point is to be as comprehensive as could be expected under the circumstances, not to supplant related ranges of examine but instead to compose and pull together subjects that regularly have been concentrated independently as various, for instance, as procedural equity and self-adequacyand to incorporate them inside a wide precise structure of negotiation results. In doing as such, we characterize the idea of subjective esteem as the social, perceptual , and passionate outcomes of a negotiation (Ricardo, 2012). Social and Mental Effects in Negotiation Past theoretical systems of negotiation frame a beginning stage for the current examination of subjective esteem, which thusly experimentally tests and accepts these structures. In their audit of research in negotiation, Davidson Greenhalgh, (2013) suggested that negotiation results fall into two expansive classes: financial and social mental. Monetary results elude to unequivocal terms or results of the negotiation, for example, regardless of whether an understanding has been achieved, how much esteem or joint advantage has been made, and how assets are isolated or asserted by the singular gatherings. Social mental measures in negotiation are grounded in social recognition and comprise of three critical components: impression of the dealing circumstance, view of the other party, and impression of oneself. In spite of the fact that Davidson Greenhalgh, (2013) structure incorporates measures of negotiation process as discrete from factors, we contend that a moderator's inclination about the procedureinstead of the prepare itselfis a part of skewed esteem. This incorporates judgments and sentiments about the negotiation procedure, for instance the standards, setting, structure what's more, scripts, correspondence and data sharing, and reasonableness or equity included. Impression of the Other Person Fisher Ury (2014) second classification, include individual observation and impression arrangement connected to one's negotiation partner. Such procedures result in emotions that can be delegated either individual or dyadicthat is, what arbitrators think about their partners, and what they think about their own associations with those partners, individually. In any case, by and by the two are progressively connected and can be hard to particular. At the individual level, this variable incorporates the attributions that mediators make about partners taking into account their conduct (e.g., their morals, strategies, and techniques), and attribute derivations, for example, the aptitude, helpfulness, invitingness, and coming about notoriety of the partner. At the dyadic level, this element incorporates the social relationship, trust, regard, enjoying, and sympathy toward the other party that creates among negotiation partners. Thompson's third class, view of the self, includes turning the individual recognition procedure internal. Mediators judge their own attributes, execution, and worth from their associations with others, utilizing both their interior attention to inspirations and values and perceptions of their own conduct as though from the outside. One of a kind to impression of the self is issues of self-viability, self-improvement and positive dreams, self-regard and looking after "face". What takes put in a negotiation can influence arbitrators' attributions about their own particular expertise. Self-viability, thusly, can affect future negotiation execution. Negotiation is a particularly delicate affair for the self since it frequently includes encounter and relegating open substantial worth to items and endeavors of individual esteem. Consultants develop a structure by highlighting independently a region included inside the primary classification, impression of the haggling circumstance: a moderator's sentiments about the last terms of the settlement. At the nexus of target and subjective esteem is the subjective sentiment fulfillment with one's goal result. Fisher Ury (2014) contended that such result fulfillment is a full of feeling similar assessment of a settlement, with suggestions for resulting conduct, for example, ability to proceed with the association with one's partner. A moderator sees a settlement to be invaluable or disadvantageous by means of social examination as for earlier desires and the results accomplished by different moderators. At some level, subjective sentiments of achievement are regularly the main input a mediator has for his or her execution. Given that outside of a classroom practice, one may know the correct dollar estimation of an arrangement yet once in a while the dollar estimati on of the most ideal arrangement that the opposite side would have acknowledged or, for sure, the dollar estimation of arrangements that would have been accomplished by companions in an indistinguishable circumstance. Concluding Remarks A middle person regularly confronts a circumstance where two individuals have some need to impart. This is because he/she often has impeccable negotiation skills to resolve any form of conflict. Nevertheless, doubt has emerged as a hindrance to their correspondence. The focal assignment of a go-between is along these lines to work through four primary stages. Build up an abnormal state of trust with each of those in debate. Channel between them enough data to assemble some level of trust between them. Accomplish a trade of the data expected to realize a determination of the con?ict. Manage the resolutions to guarantee that all interests (counting the interests of anybody not present) are considered. Given there is adequate trust between the arbiter and each of the other individuals, the data to construct trust can be diverted through the middle person. The prescribed procedure might not be easy at first glimpse, and therefore hard to identify with. Luckily it may be split into a few detach parts, each rather uncomplicated. The difficulty is in their dealings. One of the objectives of a middle person in con?ict determination is to empower the two individuals in question to embrace a critical thinking mentality towards the con?ict. For this to be done, the suitable part of the data must be traded and caught on. The data is unrealistic to be communicated in this shape toward the starting. The middle person, nevertheless, can take the data in any frame. The accompanying arrangement of inquiries can then be utilized to get the individual to change over the announcement into a more successful frame. References Allred K. G., Mallozzi, J. S., Matsui, F. and Raia, C. P. (2011) The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70: 175187 Barry, B., Fulmer, I. S., and Van Kleef, G. A. (2014) I laughed, I cried, I settled: The role of emotion in negotiation. In M. J. Gelfand J. M. Brett (Eds.), The handbook of negotiation and culture (pp. 7194). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Bazerman, M. H.; Curhan, J. R.; Moore, D. A. and Valley, K. L. (2010) Negotiation, Annual Review of Psychology, 51: 279314 Bolman, L. G and Deal (2013) Reframing organizations, 5th ed., Jossey Bass, San Francisco, USA Carlopio, G and Andrawartha, J. R (2012) Developing management skills, 5th ed., Sydney,Australia, Pearson Australia Churchman D. (2011) Negotiation Tactics, Maryland: University Press of America. pg 13 Davidson M. N. and Greenhalgh, L. (2013) The role of emotion in negotiation: The impact of anger and race, Research on Negotiation in Organizations. 7: 326 Fisher, R. and Ury W. (2014) Patton, Bruce, ed. Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in (Reprint ed.), New York, N.Y.: Penguin Books James P. (2016) Against Gridlock: The Viability of Interest-Based Legislative Negotiation, Harvard Law Policy Review (Online), Vol. 3, p. 1 Ricardo B. (2012) A Classification Structure for Automated Negotiations. 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Hong Kong, China: IEEE. pp. 523530 Saner, R. (2010) The Expert Negotiator, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, pg 40 Trotschel S. C. (2011) Perspective taking as a means to overcome motivational barriers in negotiations: When putting oneself in the opponents shoes helps to walk towards agreements, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101: 771790

Youve come a long way baby Essay Example For Students

Youve come a long way baby Essay Shakespeares presentation and portrayal of his female characters in The Merchant of Venice and Henry V follows a typical pattern that is present in all of the Shakespearean plays that I have read so far. When looking closely at the fate of his female characters, this pattern becomes even more evident for it repeats itself no matter how different the plays are. For instance, Henry V and The Merchant of Venice are different in every respect. The female characters not only come from different backgrounds, they also have very different personalities. However, as different as these plays and their characters are, the female characters end up suffering the same fate. It doesnt seem to matter whether they are born into a life of peasantry, nobility, or come from royalty, for they ultimately will end up being no better than a piece of land, or cattle, or some possession that a man can own and do with as he pleases. Scholars have been debating for centuries now as to whether Shakespeares wome n reflect his societys attitudes or that of his own. Henry V is definitely geared more for the male audience. There are only two or three acts in which a female character is present at all. When we first get a glimpse of Katherine, she is trying to learn the English language. This scene is supposed to be somewhat comical, but are we really supposed to believe that while there is a war raging throughout her country, that all Katherine is concerned about is the fact that she cant speak the language of her enemy? This scene in which we get our first glimpse of Katherine is somewhat degrading to her character as well as misleading. This leaves the audience with the inaccurate perception that Katherine, and thus all women in general, care very little about whats going on around them, and more about making themselves presentable. Afterall, isnt Katherine the Grand Prize that will be awarded to the winning side? I find it very insulting that Shakespeares only significant female role in the whole play, is being used as a Prize to be given away.Shakespeare doesnt even try to hide the fact that he is setting Katherine up as a prize. I find this kind of arrogance to be offensive and very belittling to women. While the men are off fighting the battle, Katherine, the future Queen of France, does not appear to be a bit concerned over the fate of her own country. Instead, she readily accepts her fate as she prepares herself for the role of Queen of England. We will write a custom essay on Youve come a long way baby specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now This play is very biased and one-sided. Most of the English men are portrayed as noble, humble and superior to the French. Henry himself can do no wrong, and is portrayed through out the play as the best leader that the English have ever had. This image that he can do no wrong and is as close to being perfect as one can get, only holds up if you dont go digging around in Henrys past, in which he had been portrayed as a spoiled, pampered partying boy. The French, in contrast to the English, are presented as arrogant, incompetent, and weak, very similar to what Henry had been not to long ago. There is, however, one thing lower than a Frenchman, and that is, a French woman. The fact that Shakespeare subjected Katherines character, (she, who had been born into royalty which was the highest social position one can reach), to being treated as a possession or prize for a man, only adds credence to the argument that Shakespeare had very little respect for women. Katherine character, for the most part, adds very little, if anything at all, to the play. In fact, the role of Katherine could have easily been omitted altogether, and personally, I wish it had been The last act, in which Henry easily manages to win the affections of Katherine, is a weak attempt on Shakespeares part to end the play on a an uplifting note.Its a shame that Shakespeare put it in at all because it definitely changes the way I feel about this play, in particular, as well as the others. The women characters in The Merchant of Venice are treated with much more respect than Katherine had been. However, I have a feeling that its only due to the fact that Shakespeare thinks less of Jews than he does women. The Merchant of Venice, does have a strong cast of women who play very important roles throughout the play. These women are much more impressive than those found in Henry V. Portia, in particular, is by far the superior one of the play. Like Queen Elizabeth herself, Portias character is a blending of femininity and masculinity.Portia has great strength of character, a quick wit, and is very well educated in the affairs of the world around her which is not a common theme in Shakespeares women. She is in every respect far superior to the fools she ends up being surrounded by. This might not have been the case if it werent for the fact that she, with all her intelligence and wit is still being dictated by a male. Her dead father dictates her life through his will. I gues s Shakespeare does not miss an opportunity to put even the most superior of all women in her place as he does just that to Portia. For all her power, riches, and strengths, she still is no better than the man she marries. Her new husband, Barsenio, is no match for her, and yet he is handed over everything that belongs to her, including her soul. Although Shakespeare gives the very best of qualities and traits to the female character Portia, he knows that in spite of her superiority and domination over all the other characters including the male characters, he can later strip her of all her greatness at any time, and does just that at the end of the play. What I find so unbelievable is the way that Shakespeares women just hand over everything including themselves, no questions asked, to a man they hardly know and yet willingly and happily marry. I have a hard time believing that women of his day did this duty so graciously. .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc , .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc .postImageUrl , .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc , .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc:hover , .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc:visited , .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc:active { border:0!important; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc:active , .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf6d0cf8a3d4ae4c54be7f8c3f89761cc:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: For many years now I have listened to teachers spe EssayPortias portrayal of being such a strong figure and at the same time, a woman who is subservient to her times, makes me question whether Shakespeare really knew what was gong on in the minds of the Elizabethan women. Just the fact that he disguises his women characters up as men in order to bring them to higher levels, leads me to believe that he is just making it all up as he goes along. Dont get me wrong, I love most of Shakespeares work. Its just his female characters that I have a problem with. When reading Shakespeare it is easy to question what his motives might have been. Scholars have been doing this for centuries. We will never be sure as to whether or not Shakespeare was reflecting the times or his own feelings. One must keep in mind when reading Shakespeare that hs writings are not historically accurate and therefore most likely only reflect his views on things. I only hope that is the case, for I cant imagine women ever being so passive. Could we have really been the passive beings that Shakespeare portrays women as, I seriously doubt it. Shakespeares presentation and portrayal of his female characters in The Merchant of Venice and Henry V follows a typical pattern that is present in all of the Shakespearean plays that I have read so far. When looking closely at the fate of his female characters, this pattern becomes even more evident for it repeats itself no matter how different the plays are. For instance, Henry V and The Merchant of Venice are different in every respect. The female characters not only come from different backgrounds, they also have very different personalities. However, as different as these plays and their characters are, the female characters end up suffering the same fate. It doesnt seem to matter whether they are born into a life of peasantry, nobility, or come from royalty, for they ultimately will end up being no better than a piece of land, or cattle, or some possession that a man can own and do with as he pleases. Scholars have been debating for centuries now as to whether Shakespeares wome n reflect his societys attitudes or that of his own. Henry V is definitely geared more for the male audience. There are only two or three acts in which a female character is present at all. When we first get a glimpse of Katherine, she is trying to learn the English language. This scene is supposed to be somewhat comical, but are we really supposed to believe that while there is a war raging throughout her country, that all Katherine is concerned about is the fact that she cant speak the language of her enemy? This scene in which we get our first glimpse of Katherine is somewhat degrading to her character as well as misleading. This leaves the audience with the inaccurate perception that Katherine, and thus all women in general, care very little about whats going on around them, and more about making themselves presentable. Afterall, isnt Katherine the Grand Prize that will be awarded to the winning side? I find it very insulting that Shakespeares only significant female role in the whole play, is being used as a Prize to be given away.Shakespeare doesnt even try to hide the fact that he is setting Katherine up as a prize. I find this kind of arrogance to be offensive and very belittling to women. While the men are off fighting the battle, Katherine, the future Queen of France, does not appear to be a bit concerned over the fate of her own country. Instead, she readily accepts her fate as she prepares herself for the role of Queen of England. .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 , .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 .postImageUrl , .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 , .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39:hover , .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39:visited , .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39:active { border:0!important; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39:active , .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39 .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ufb896e381deb494cb8cead5b837cfa39:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Burmese Days Essay PaperThis play is very biased and one-sided. Most of the English men are portrayed as noble, humble and superior to the French. Henry himself can do no wrong, and is portrayed through out the play as the best leader that the English have ever had. This image that he can do no wrong and is as close to being perfect as one can get, only holds up if you dont go digging around in Henrys past, in which he had been portrayed as a spoiled, pampered partying boy. The French, in contrast to the English, are presented as arrogant, incompetent, and weak, very similar to what Henry had been not to long ago. There is, however, one thing lower than a Frenchman, and th at is, a French woman. The fact that Shakespeare subjected Katherines character, (she, who had been born into royalty which was the highest social position one can reach), to being treated as a possession or prize for a man, only adds credence to the argument that Shakespeare had very little respect for women. Katherine character, for the most part, adds very little, if anything at all, to the play. In fact, the role of Katherine could have easily been omitted altogether, and personally, I wish it had been The last act, in which Henry easily manages to win the affections of Katherine, is a weak attempt on Shakespeares part to end the play on a an uplifting note.Its a shame that Shakespeare put it in at all because it definitely changes the way I feel about this play, in particular, as well as the others. The women characters in The Merchant of Venice are treated with much more respect than Katherine had been. However, I have a feeling that its only due to the fact that Shakespeare thinks less of Jews than he does women. The Merchant of Venice, does have a strong cast of women who play very important roles throughout the play. These women are much more impressive than those found in Henry V. Portia, in particular, is by far the superior one of the play. Like Queen Elizabeth herself, Portias character is a blending of femininity and masculinity.Portia has great strength of character, a quick wit, and is very well educated in the affairs of the world around her which is not a common theme in Shakespeares women. She is in every respect far superior to the fools she ends up being surrounded by. This might not have been the case if it werent for the fact that she, with all her intelligence and wit is still being dictated by a male. Her dead father dictates her life through his will. I gues s Shakespeare does not miss an opportunity to put even the most superior of all women in her place as he does just that to Portia. For all her power, riches, and strengths, she still is no better than the man she marries. Her new husband, Barsenio, is no match for her, and yet he is handed over everything that belongs to her, including her soul. Although Shakespeare gives the very best of qualities and traits to the female character Portia, he knows that in spite of her superiority and domination over all the other characters including the male characters, he can later strip her of all her greatness at any time, and does just that at the end of the play. What I find so unbelievable is the way that Shakespeares women just hand over everything including themselves, no questions asked, to a man they hardly know and yet willingly and happily marry. I have a hard time believing that women of his day did this duty so graciously. Portias portrayal of being such a strong figure and at the same time, a woman who is subservient to her times, makes me question whether Shakespeare really knew what was gong on in the minds of the Elizabethan women. Just the fact that he disguises his women characters up as men in order to bring them to higher levels, leads me to believe that he is just making it all up as he goes along. Dont get me wrong, I love most of Shakespeares work. Its just his female characters that I have a problem with. When reading Shakespeare it is easy to question what his motives might have been. Scholars have been doing this for centuries. We will never be sure as to whether or not Shakespeare was reflecting the times or his own feelings. One must keep in mind when reading Shakespeare that hs writings are not historically accurate and therefore most likely only reflect his views on things. I only hope that is the case, for I cant imagine women ever being so passive. Could we have really been the passive beings that Shakespeare portrays women as, I seriously doubt it. Bibliography: Youve come a long way baby Essay Example For Students Youve come a long way baby Essay Shakespeares presentation and portrayal of his female characters in The Merchant of Venice and Henry V follows a typical pattern that is present in all of the Shakespearean plays that I have read so far. When looking closely at the fate of his female characters, this pattern becomes even more evident for it repeats itself no matter how different the plays are. For instance, Henry V and The Merchant of Venice are different in every respect. The female characters not only come from different backgrounds, they also have very different personalities. However, as different as these plays and their characters are, the female characters end up suffering the same fate. We will write a custom essay on Youve come a long way baby specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now It doesnt seem to matter whether they are born into a life of peasantry, nobility, or come from royalty, for they ultimately will end up being no better than a piece of land, or cattle, or some possession that a man can own and do with as he pleases. Scholars have been debating for centuries now as to whether Shakespeares women reflect his societys attitudes or that of his own. Henry V is definitely geared more for the male audience. There are only two or three acts in which a female character is present at all. When we first get a glimpse of Katherine, she is trying to learn the English language. This scene is supposed to be somewhat comical, but are we really supposed to believe that while there is a war raging throughout her country, that all Katherine is concerned about is the fact that she cant speak the language of her enemy? This scene in which we get our first glimpse of Katherine is somewhat degrading to her character as well as misleading. This leaves the audience with the inaccurate perception that Katherine, and thus all women in general, care very little about whats going on around them, and more about making themselves presentable. Afterall, isnt Katherine the Grand Prize that will be awarded to the winning side? I find it very insulting that Shakespeares only significant female role in the whole play, is being used as a Prize to be given away. Shakespeare doesnt even try to hide the fact that he is setting Katherine up as a prize. I find this kind of arrogance to be offensive and very belittling to women. While the men are off fighting the battle, Katherine, the future Queen of France, does not appear to be a bit concerned over the fate of her own country. Instead, she readily accepts her fate as she prepares herself for the role of Queen of England. This play is very biased and one-sided. Most of the English men are portrayed as noble, humble and superior to the French. Henry himself can do no wrong, and is portrayed through out the play as the best leader that the English have ever had. This image that he can do no wrong and is as close to being perfect as one can get, only holds up if you dont go digging around in Henrys past, in which he had been portrayed as a spoiled, pampered partying boy. The French, in contrast to the English, are presented as arrogant, incompetent, and weak, very similar to what Henry had been not to long ago. There is, however, one thing lower than a Frenchman, and that is, a French woman. The fact that Shakespeare subjected Katherines character, (she, who had been born into royalty which was the highest social position one can reach), to being treated as a possession or prize for a man, only adds credence to the argument that Shakespeare had very little respect for women. Katherine character, for the most part, adds very little, if anything at all, to the play. In fact, the role of Katherine could have easily been omitted altogether, and personally, I wish it had been The last act, in which Henry easily manages to win the affections of Katherine, is a weak attempt on Shakespeares part to end the play on a an uplifting note. Its a shame that Shakespeare put it in at all because it definitely changes the way I feel about this play, in particular, as .